Harvard Law Review 2020
- Vol.133
- Cambridge Harvard Law Review Association 2020
- Part No.1 Pg: 1 to 1510 & Part No.2 Pg 1511 to 2660 25cm
Harvard Law Review Vol.133 Part 1 : VMS-022752 Pg: 1-1510p. Part 2 : VMS-022753 Pg: 1511-2660p. Harvard Law Review 2020 RC/28 dt:19/12/2020 Payment Details DD.No: 617140 dt: 05/02/2021 Amt Rs: 20527/-
• Abolition Constitutionalism Dorothy E. Roberts ESSAY • The Solicitor General and the Shadow Docket Stephen I. Vladeck COMMENTS • Delegation and Interpretive Discretion: Gundy, Kisor, and the Formation and Future of Administrative Law Aditya Bamzai • Categorical Mistakes: The Flawed Framework of the Armed Career Criminal Act and Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Rachel E. Barkow LEADING CASES • Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill • Rucho v. Common Cause • American Legion v. American Humanist Ass’n • Nieves v. Bartlett • Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck • Iancu v. Brunetti • Mitchell v. Wisconsin • Gamble v. United States • Knick v. Township of Scott • Bucklew v. Precythe • Timbs v. Indiana • Flowers v. Mississippi • Franchise Tax Board v. Hyatt • Department of Commerce v. New York • Apple Inc. v. Pepper • Nielsen v. Preap • Herrera v. Wyoming
ARTICLES • Free Speech and Justified True Belief Joseph Blocher • A Skeptical View of Information Fiduciaries ARTICLES Free Speech and Justified True BeliefJoseph Blocher A Skeptical View of Information FiduciariesDavid E. Pozen & Lina M. Khan Solitary Confinement in the Young RepublicDavid M. Shapiro NOTES Of Priests, Pupils, and Procedure: The Ministerial Exception as a Cause Of Action for On-Campus Student Ministries The Sovereign Self-Preservation Doctrine in Environmental Law A Shield for David and a Sword Against Goliath: Protecting Association While Combatting Dark Money Through Proportionality Vertical Shareholding RECENT CASES Davis v. Guam Wilson v. Safelite Group, Inc. Martin v. City of Boise Sims v. Hyatte Jordan v. Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections State v. Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. RECENT PROPOSED JUDGMENT Proposed Final Judgment, United States v. Deutsche Telekom AG
TRIBUTE Justice John Paul Stevens Alison J. Nathan, Christopher L. Eisgruber, David Barron, Eduardo M. Peñalver, John G. Roberts Jr. & Olatunde C.A. Johnson ARTICLES Race, Pregnancy, and the Opioid Epidemic: White Privilege and the Criminalization of Opioid Use During PregnancyKhiara M. Bridges Neoclassical Administrative LawJeffrey A. Pojanowski The Lost History of the “Universal” InjunctionMila Sohoni BOOK REVIEW A Four-Decade Perspective on Life Inside the Supreme CourtGeoffrey R. Stone NOTE Pack the Union: A Proposal to Admit New States for the Purpose of Amending the Constitution to Ensure Equal Representation RECENT CASES Baca v. Colorado Department of State Brakebill v. Jaeger United States v. Flute In re U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation Kashef v. BNP Paribas S.A. Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. U.S. Department of Justice Elster v. City of Seattle RECENT INDICTMENT Indictment, United States v. Joseph ARTICLES Property and ProjectionMaureen E. Brady Go-Shops RevisitedAnnie Zhao & Guhan Subramanian BOOK REVIEW Economies of SurveillanceAziz Z. Huq & Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar NOTES The Establishment Clause and the Chilling Effect Wielding Antidiscrimination Law to Suppress the Movement for Palestinian Rights The Support or Advocacy Clause of § 1985(3) Executive Adjudication of State Law RECENT CASES FTC v. Credit Bureau Center, LLC United States v. Schmidt Overbey v. Mayor of Baltimore Bowers v. United States Parole Commission Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. v. Lincoln Property Co. Bryan v. United States Colorado Department of Labor & Employment v. Dami Hospitality, LLC RECENT ADJUDICATION Matter of L-E-A-
ARTICLES Adjudication Outside Article IIIWilliam Baude The New Presumption Against ExtraterritorialityWilliam S. Dodge BOOK REVIEW The End of Antitrust History RevisitedLina M. Khan NOTES Constitutional Privacy and the Fight Over Access to Sex-Segregated Spaces Controller Confusion: Realigning Controlling Stockholders and Controlled Boards Making Chinese Court Filings Public? Some Not-So-Foreign American Insights RECENT CASES In re Hyundai & Kia Fuel Economy Litigation Kelsay v. Ernst Agnew v. Government of the District of Columbia Fazaga v. FBI Perez v. Abbott Save America’s Clocks, Inc. v. City of New York Taylor v. Burlington Northern Railroad Holdings, Inc. RECENT LEGISLATION H.R. 1, 116th Cong. (2019) RECENT PUBLICATIONS
ARTICLES The Prisoner TradeEmma Kaufman Tax Limits and the Future of Local DemocracyAriel Jurow Kleiman BOOK REVIEWS On Trust, Law, and Expecting the WorstElizabeth F. Emens Can Rights Combat Economic Inequality?Mila Versteeg DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW Introduction The Intellectual History of Unjust Enrichment The Future of Restitution and Equity in the Distribution of Funds Recovered from Ponzi Schemes and Other Multi-Victim Frauds Restitution at Home: Unjust Compensation for Unmarried Cohabitants’ Domestic Labor Aloha ‘Āina: Native Hawaiian Land Restitution RECENT CASES First Amendment Coalition of Arizona, Inc. v. Ryan Hernandez v. United States Semple v. Griswold Zuckerman v. Metropolitan Museum of Art EMW Women’s Surgical Center, P.S.C. v. Beshear White v. Square, Inc. RECENT PUBLICATIONS
ARTICLE The New MaternityCourtney Megan Cahill BOOK REVIEW Implicit Bias in the Age of TrumpCharles R. Lawrence III NOTES Two Models of the Right to Not Speak Accession on the Frontiers of Property RECENT CASES United States v. Hill Fowler v. Benson In re: S.K. State v. VanBuren RECENT LEGISLATION Assemb. B. 5, 2019–2020 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Cal. 2019)
TRIBUTE Professor David L. Shapiro Amanda L. Tyler, Brian T. Fitzpatrick, Charles Fried, John F. Manning, Richard H. Fallon Jr. & Ruth Bader Ginsburg ARTICLE Expungement of Criminal Convictions: An Empirical StudyJ.J. Prescott & Sonja B. Starr NOTES Antitrust Federalism, Preemption, and Judge-Made Law The Potential-Use Test and the Northwest Passage RECENT CASES Bigger v. Facebook, Inc. Kollaritsch v. Michigan State University Board of Trustees United States v. Cano NLRB v. International Ass’n of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental, & Reinforcing Iron Workers, Local 229 In re: Application to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings Doe I v. Nestle, S.A. United States v. Huskisson
The Harvard Law Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. The Review comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2,500 pages per volume. The organization is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions and, together with a professional business staff of three, carry out day-to-day operations.
Aside from serving as an important academic forum for legal scholarship, the Review has two other goals. First, the journal is designed to be an effective research tool for practicing lawyers and students of the law. Second, it provides opportunities for Review members to develop their own editing and writing skills. Accordingly, each issue contains pieces by student editors as well as outside authors.
The Review publishes articles by professors, judges, and practitioners and solicits reviews of important recent books from recognized experts. All articles — even those by the most respected authorities — are subjected to a rigorous editorial process designed to sharpen and strengthen substance and tone.
Most student writing takes the form of Notes, Recent Cases, and Recent Legislation. Notes are approximately 22 pages and are usually written by third-year students. Recent Cases and Recent Legislation are normally 8 pages and are written mainly by second-year students. Recent Cases are comments on recent decisions by courts other than the U.S. Supreme Court, such as state supreme courts, federal circuit courts, federal district courts, and foreign courts. Recent Legislation look at new statutes at either the state or federal level.
Student-written pieces also appear in the special November and April issues. In addition to the Supreme Court Foreword (usually by a prominent constitutional law scholar), faculty Case Comments, and a compilation of statistics about the Court’s previous Term, the November issue includes about 20 Leading Cases, which are analyses by third-year students of the most important decisions of the previous Supreme Court Term. The April issue features the annual Developments in the Law, an in-depth treatment of an important area of the law prepared by third-year editors of the Review.
0017811X
Constitutionalism, First Amendment, Forth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Eighth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, Federalism, Free Speech, Civil Procedure, AntiTrust, International Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Cyber Law, Civil Rights Litigation, Fair Housing, Administrative Law, --United States of America (U.S.A.)