MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
09258nam a2200181 4500 |
| 020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER |
|---|
| ISBN |
0017811X |
| 082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER |
|---|
| Classification number |
347.05 |
| Item number |
HLR/2021/134/ |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Harvard Law Review Association |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Harvard Law Review 2021 |
| 250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT |
|---|
| Edition statement |
Vol.134 |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Place of publication |
Cambridge |
| Name of publisher |
Havard Law Review Association |
| Year of publication |
2021 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Number of Pages |
Part No.1 Pg: 1-1608p. & Part No.2 Pg: 1609-2894p. |
| Other physical details |
25cm, |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE |
|---|
| General note |
Harvard Law Review 2021 Vol.134<br/>Part 1 VMS-022754 Pg: 1-1608p.<br/>Part 2 VMS-022755 Pg: 1609-2894p.<br/>Harvard Law Review 2021<br/>RC/29 Dt:20/12/2021 <br/>Payment Details <br/>DD No: 617188 Dt: 24/02/2022 Amt Rs: 21900/- |
| 505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE |
|---|
| Formatted contents note |
FOREWORD<br/>The Degradation of American Democracy — And the CourtMichael J. Klarman<br/>COMMENTS<br/>Which Textualism?Tara Leigh Grove<br/>The Symbiosis of Abortion and PrecedentMelissa Murray<br/>The Political Economy of the Removal PowerGanesh Sitaraman<br/>LEADING CASES<br/>Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam<br/>Chiafalo v. Washington<br/>Trump v. Vance<br/>New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. City of New York<br/>Republican National Committee v. Democratic National Committee<br/>Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru<br/>Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue<br/>United States v. Sineneng-Smith<br/>Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.<br/>Kansas v. Glover<br/>Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California<br/>Ramos v. Louisiana<br/>Kahler v. Kansas<br/>Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP<br/>Hernández v. Mesa<br/>Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania<br/>Maine Community Health Options v. United States<br/>Comcast Corp. v. National Ass’n of African American–Owned Media<br/>County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund<br/>McGirt v. Oklahoma<br/><br/>ARTICLES<br/>The Failed Transparency Regime for Executive Agreements: An Empirical and Normative Analysis<br/>Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith & Oona A. Hathaway<br/>Testing Ordinary MeaningKevin P. Tobia<br/>NOTES<br/>Judicial Takings, Judicial Federalism, and Jurisprudence: An Erie Problem<br/>The “Prudential Exhaustion” Doctrine in Transnational Litigation in U.S. Courts<br/>RECENT CASES<br/>Democratic National Committee v. Hobbs<br/>White Glove Staffing, Inc. v. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas<br/><br/>TRIBUTE<br/>Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg<br/>Brenda Feigen, Daphna Renan, Deborah Jones Merritt, Harry T. Edwards, John G. Roberts Jr., Margo Schlanger & Paul J. Watford<br/>ARTICLES<br/>Decryption Originalism: The Lessons of BurrOrin S. Kerr<br/>Criminal Municipal CourtsAlexandra Natapoff<br/>BOOK REVIEW<br/>Legal Internalism In Modern Histories of CopyrightShyamkrishna Balganesh & Taisu Zhang<br/>NOTES<br/>Nondelegation’s Unprincipled Foreign Affairs Exceptionalism<br/>Tribal Power, Worker Power: Organizing Unions in the Context of Native Sovereignty<br/>State Courts and the Federalization of Arbitration Law<br/>Beyond “No Law to Apply”: Uniting the Current Court in the Context of APA Reviewability<br/>RECENT CASES<br/>In re Abbott<br/>In re State<br/>Liberian Community Ass’n of Connecticut v. Lamont<br/>Mays v. LaRose<br/>United States v. Vaello-Madero<br/>Commonwealth v. Mora<br/>The Hagia Sophia Case<br/>Ramirez v. TransUnion LLC<br/><br/>ARTICLES<br/>Rethinking Protections For Indigenous Sacred SitesMichalyn Steele & Stephanie Hall Barclay<br/>Long Live The Federal Power Act’s Bright LineJoshua C. Macey & Matthew R. Christiansen<br/>BOOK REVIEW<br/>Modern Tort Law: Preventing Harms, Not Recognizing WrongsCatherine M. Sharkey<br/>NOTES<br/>In the Best Interests of the Child Asylum-Seeker: A Threat to Family Unity<br/>Tribes Can Prohibit Abortions In Indian Country<br/>Interpreting Congress’s Creation of Alternative Remedial Schemes<br/>Black Lives Discounted: Altering the Standard for Voir Dire and the Rules of Evidence to Better Account for Implicit Racial Biases Against Black Victims in Self-Defense Cases<br/>RECENT CASES<br/>Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin<br/>Ass’n for Community Affiliated Plans v. U.S. Department of the Treasury<br/>State v. Degroot<br/>Data Protection Commissioner v. Facebook Ireland Ltd.<br/>Washington Post v. McManus<br/>Oneida Nation v. Village of Hobart<br/>Gogel v. Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc.<br/>New York v. U.S. Department of Justice<br/><br/>ARTICLES<br/>Turning Neighbors Into NuisancesMaureen E. Brady<br/>Fair Housing For A Non-Sexist CityNoah M. Kazis<br/>NOTES<br/>Beyond Intent: Establishing Discriminatory Purpose in Algorithmic Risk Assessment<br/>Constitutional Constraints on Free Exercise Analogies<br/>Fanciful Failures: Keeping Nonsense Marks off the Trademark Register<br/>The Agreement and the Girmitiya<br/>Prosecuting in the Police-less City: Police Abolition’s Impact on Local Prosecutors<br/>RECENT CASES<br/>Castillo v. G&M Realty L.P.<br/>Ali v. Barr<br/>City of Oakland v. BP PLC<br/>National Wildlife Federation v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation<br/>Baten v. McMaster<br/>United States v. Rosemond<br/>Juliana v. United States<br/><br/>ARTICLES<br/>Privatization’s Preemptive EffectsCraig Konnoth<br/>Race-ing Roe: Reproductive Justice, Racial Justice, and the Battle for Roe v. WadeMelissa Murray<br/>BOOK REVIEW<br/>Living The Sacred: Indigenous Peoples and Religious FreedomKristen A. Carpenter<br/>DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW<br/>Introduction<br/>Outlawing Trans Youth: State Legislatures and the Battle over Gender-Affirming Healthcare for Minors<br/>Reframing the Harm: Religious Exemptions and Third-Party Harm After Little Sisters<br/>The Legal Infrastructure of Childbirth<br/>Conditions of Confinement, COVID-19, and the CDC<br/>RECENT CASES<br/>Tomasella v. Nestlé USA, Inc<br/>State v. Andrews<br/>United States v. Varner<br/>Physicians for Social Responsibility v. Wheeler<br/>Jones v. Governor of Florida<br/><br/><br/>ARTICLES<br/>The Non–First Amendment Law of Freedom of SpeechGenevieve Lakier<br/>Monopolizing WhitenessErika K. Wilson<br/>BOOK REVIEW<br/>Feminist Scripts for PunishmentI. India Thusi<br/>NOTES<br/>Affirmative Duties in Immigration Detention<br/>Geofence Warrants and the Fourth Amendment<br/>From Domicile to Dominion: India’s Settler Colonial Agenda in Kashmir<br/>Constitutional Waivers by States and Criminal Defendants<br/>RECENT CASES<br/>De Pena-Paniagua v. Barr<br/>Williams v. Medley Opportunity Fund II, LP<br/>Doe v. University of the Sciences<br/>Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller<br/>California v. EPA<br/>United States v. Miselis<br/>Swain v. Junior<br/>Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College<br/>Wilson v. Houston Community College System<br/><br/>ARTICLES<br/>Policing the Emergency RoomJi Seon Song<br/>Privacy as Privilege: The Stored Communications Act and Internet EvidenceRebecca Wexler<br/>BOOK REVIEW<br/>Making Immigration LawHiroshi Motomura<br/>NOTE<br/>The President’s Conditional Pardon Power<br/>RECENT CASES<br/>United States v. Jones<br/>Otto v. City of Boca Raton<br/>Revitch v. DIRECTV, LLC<br/>United States v. Trice<br/>Commonwealth v. McCarthy<br/> |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc |
The Harvard Law Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. The Review comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2,500 pages per volume. The organization is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions and, together with a professional business staff of three, carry out day-to-day operations.<br/><br/>Aside from serving as an important academic forum for legal scholarship, the Review has two other goals. First, the journal is designed to be an effective research tool for practicing lawyers and students of the law. Second, it provides opportunities for Review members to develop their own editing and writing skills. Accordingly, each issue contains pieces by student editors as well as outside authors.<br/><br/>The Review publishes articles by professors, judges, and practitioners and solicits reviews of important recent books from recognized experts. All articles — even those by the most respected authorities — are subjected to a rigorous editorial process designed to sharpen and strengthen substance and tone.<br/><br/>Most student writing takes the form of Notes, Recent Cases, and Recent Legislation. Notes are approximately 22 pages and are usually written by third-year students. Recent Cases and Recent Legislation are normally 8 pages and are written mainly by second-year students. Recent Cases are comments on recent decisions by courts other than the U.S. Supreme Court, such as state supreme courts, federal circuit courts, federal district courts, and foreign courts. Recent Legislation look at new statutes at either the state or federal level.<br/><br/>Student-written pieces also appear in the special November and April issues. In addition to the Supreme Court Foreword (usually by a prominent constitutional law scholar), faculty Case Comments, and a compilation of statistics about the Court’s previous Term, the November issue includes about 20 Leading Cases, which are analyses by third-year students of the most important decisions of the previous Supreme Court Term. The April issue features the annual Developments in the Law, an in-depth treatment of an important area of the law prepared by third-year editors of the Review. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical Term |
Constitutional Law, Federal Statutes, Treaties, Clean Water Act, Civil Rights, Election Law, Criminal Procedure, Intellectual Property, Administrative law, National Security Law, Employment Law, |
| Geographic subdivision |
United States of America (U.S.A.) |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Koha item type |
Bound Book |